Non-international armed conflicts (NIAC) involve either a State fighting organized armed group(s), or organized armed groups fighting each other. For a NIAC to exist, two criteria must be met under Article 3 common to the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and customary international law:
- Intensity of armed violence: there must be ‘protracted armed violence’ – meaning that the violence must have reached a certain level of intensity.
- Degree of organization: the armed groups must exhibit a certain degree of organization. For state armed forces, the criterion of organization is usually met and they are presumed to be organized.1 ICRC, Updated Commentary on GC I, 2016, paras 493 ff.
These criteria, which are assessed on a case-by-case basis, are used for the purpose of distinguishing an armed conflict from banditry, unorganized or short-lived insurrections or terrorist activities and are closely related to each other. According to international case-law, certain indicative factors can be used to assess them, including:
- For intensity: the number, duration and intensity of individual confrontations; the types of weapons and military equipment used; the material destruction and casualties; the number of refugees and internally displaced persons; the reaction of the government (including the use of force and the application of a legal framework); the reaction and involvement of the international community.
- Organization: the presence of some kind of command structure; the ability to define a unified military strategy and use military tactics; the ability to plan, coordinate and carry out military operations; the exercise of some kind of territorial control; the capacity to access to weapons and other military equipment; the ability to recruit and train members; the ability to speak with one voice and to negotiate and conclude agreements, such as ceasefire and peace accords; the existence of internal discipline mechanism, with a responsible command and the ability to implement IHL.2 See for instance, ICTY, Haradinaj, Trial Chamber, Judgment, IT-04-84-T, 3 April 2008, paras 49 and 60, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/2008/en/61839.
In NIACs, Additional Protocol II to the 1949 Geneva Conventions (AP II) provides more detailed rules than those that can be found in Common Article 3 1949 Geneva Conventions. For AP II to apply, additional requirements must exist on top of those demanding a certain level of intensity of violence and organization of the armed group. Thus, the NIAC must occur in the territory of a State that is a party to AP II; the armed conflict must occur between governmental armed forces, on the one hand, and organized armed group(s), on the other hand; and the organized armed group(s) must exercise a degree of territorial control that enables them to carry out sustained and concerted military operations and to implement AP II.3 Art 1(1) AP II.
- 1
- 2See for instance, ICTY, Haradinaj, Trial Chamber, Judgment, IT-04-84-T, 3 April 2008, paras 49 and 60, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/2008/en/61839.
- 3Art 1(1) AP II.