Throughout the reporting period, Iraq has witnessed the continuation of long-standing armed conflicts, as well as the emergence of relatively short-lived new confrontations. Although the level of violence experienced since 2023 was lower compared to previous years, several situations (continue to) amount to armed conflicts under IHL. Iraq (supported by international partners) continues to carry out operations against the Islamic State (ISIL), which (despite a much-reduced territorial footprint compared to the mid-2010s) still represents a security threat capable of mounting coordinated violence. Despite the announcement in May 2025 that the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) would dissolve, cross-border hostilities in northern Iraq between that armed group and Türkiye went on, notwithstanding the lack of Iraqi consent to the use of force in its territory by its neighbouring State. Between late 2023 and early 2024, violence also escalated between Iran-linked Shia militias in Iraq fighting under the banner of the Islamic Resistance in Iraq – IRI (which attacked US forces and bases in the Middle East) and the US (which reacted by launching airstrikes without Iraq consent). Finally, in early 2024 two Iranian missiles, allegedly aimed at Israeli targets, landed in Erbil province of Iraq, amounting to a form of unconsented-to use of force on Iraqi territory.
Classification(s) and Parties to the Conflict(s)
- IAC between Iraq and Türkiye
- IAC between Iraq and the US
- IAC between Iraq and Iran (early 2024)
- NIAC between Iraq, supported by States contributing to the Combined Joint Task Force of “Operation Inherent Resolve” (CJTF-OIR), and ISIL
- NIAC between the US and the IRI (from October 2023 to February 2024)
- NIAC between Türkiye and the PKK
Hundreds of civilian casualties were recorded during the reporting period. Indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks were reportedly carried out by ISIL, Iraqi armed forces and Türkiye. Turkish forces reportedly struck journalists based on alleged PKK links, including through drone attacks on media vehicles. Landmines and other explosive remnants of war continued to kill and injure civilians, restrict their movement and services, and impede livelihoods. Serious concerns also arose over conflict-related forced displacement of Kurdish communities as a result of Turkish military operations. Civilian infrastructure (including homes, villages, displacement camps, objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, and cultural property) was regularly attacked, particularly by Turkish Armed Forces. The cumulative impact of air and ground operations on populated areas as well as agricultural and grazing lands caused extensive damage to civilian property and left large swaths of Iraqi territory uninhabitable. Unlawful killings persisted, with ISIL continuing to murder civilians and Iraq imposing death sentences following flawed procedures. Allegations of torture, arbitrary deprivation of liberty and inhuman treatment by Iraqi security forces persisted, while ISIL carried out abductions of civilians. Women and children continued to face limited protection for conflict-related sexual violence: whereas those perceived as tied to ISIL faced difficulties in reintegration, Yazidi women and girls with children born of rape remained particularly vulnerable. Disability is extremely high after decades of conflict, with widespread anti-personnel mines causing thousands of traumatic amputations. Mass graves containing up to 400,000 victims were also discovered during the reporting period.
Historical background
The rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Iraq
By 2014, Iraq was engaged in a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) with ISIL. Following the fall of Mosul in June 2014, the Iraqi government requested international assistance, leading to the formation of an international Combined Joint Task Force as part of “Operation Inherent Resolve” (CJTF-OIR) and to the provision of support by Kurdish Peshmerga. The campaign against ISIL intensified until late 2017, when ISIL lost key strongholds and Iraq declared the border secured and the group defeated. States involved in CJTF-OIR ended combat missions but continued to support Iraq, including through transport, refuelling, surveillance, advising and training. Shia militias organized in Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Units (PMU) also fought ISIL; though affiliated with the Iraqi State since 2016, many of their factions operated largely outside government control.
The situation between Türkiye and the Kurds in Iraq
Long-standing tensions between Türkiye and the Kurds produced a NIAC between Türkiye and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) from 1984 that later extended into Iraq. Since December 2015, Türkiye has carried out cross-border air and then ground operations in Iraq without the consent of the Iraqi government, which repeatedly protested against sovereignty violations. The PKK is distinct from the Peshmerga, the official forces of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, whose NIAC with Baghdad ended by late 2017.
Key developments (2023-2025)
Since 2023, the armed conflicts in Iraq have remained relatively low in intensity, with only a few developments relevant to their classification:
- NIAC between Iraq, supported by the CJTF-OIR, and ISIL: The conflict’s character remained largely unchanged, with ISIL’s footprint further reduced by sustained Iraqi and CJTF-OIR counter-terrorism operations. The Iraqi government asserted growing capacity to manage security and announced a transition away from the Coalition’s military mission toward bilateral security partnerships by late September 2025. Residual threat indicators persisted, as joint operations and sporadic clashes continued and authorities warned of possible resurgence of ISIL.
- Growing violence between the US and Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI): Domestic pressure over the US presence in Iraq rose amid escalated exchanges with Shia militias operating under the banner of IRI. Militia attacks on US forces increased after October 2023 and were met by US airstrikes in Syria and notably Iraq, which the Iraqi government condemned as violations of its sovereignty. Following a pause in attacks by Kataib Hezbollah (a faction of IRI), the Iraqi government announced the disarmament and demobilization of Iranian-linked militias in Iraq, which some factions have resisted.
- Growing tensions between Türkiye and PKK: Türkiye carried out frequent cross-border air and ground operations in northern Iraq and, in turn, the PKK launched regular attacks against Türkiye. Despite the announcement by the PKK in May 2025 that it would dissolve as an armed group, Turkish operations continued. Moreover, in March 2024 Iraq shifted its long-standing policy of tolerance of the PKK by banning its activity in Iraqi territory and establishing a joint security framework with Türkiye, later formalized by a memorandum of understanding.
- Iranian missiles on Iraqi territory: In early 2024, Iranian missiles allegedly directed towards Israeli targets landed in Erbil province, prompting Iraqi protests over sovereignty violations. No further incidents were reported in the subsequent year.
International Armed Conflicts
Iraq vs Türkiye
Iraq vs the United States (US)
Iraq vs Iran in early 2024
Non-International Armed Conflicts
Iraq, supported by the Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF-OIR) vs the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)
The United States (US) vs the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI)
Türkiye vs the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)
Key parties to the conflict
State Parties
- Iraq
- United States
- Türkiye
- States contributing to the Combined Joint Task Force of “Operation Inherent Resolve” (CJTF-OIR), including the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, Australia (at least until December 2024), Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy.
- Iran (early 2024)
Non-state parties
- Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK)
- Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI) (from October 2023 to February 2024)
- Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)
ATTACKS ON CIVILIANS
Hundreds of civilian casualties were recorded during the period. Reports alleged indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks by Islamic State, Iraqi armed forces and Türkiye. Turkish forces reportedly struck journalists based on alleged PKK links, including drone attacks on media vehicles, amid rising intimidation and violence. Landmines and other explosive remnants continued to kill and injure civilians, restrict their movement and services, and impede livelihoods. There were also reports of forcible displacement of civilians by the Turkish Armed Forces without lawful justification, with Iraqi authorities failing to take appropriate measures to halt and investigate such violations.
Attacks against Journalists
During the period, several attacks by Turkish Armed Forces against journalists were reported, apparently based on alleged PKK affiliation. Drone strikes on media vehicles caused deaths and injuries. Journalists reported rising violence and intimidation, and a regional court in Iraqi Kurdistan sentenced a media editor to three years for espionage and alleged ties to a Kurdish party close to the PKK. Absent clear evidence of direct participation in hostilities at the time, these attacks raise serious concerns about compliance with the principles of distinction and precautions in attack, and may breach the duty to respect and protect journalists.
ATTACKS ON CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE
During the period, civilian objects were regularly attacked, particularly in areas under the control of the Turkish Armed Forces, including homes, villages, displacement camps, objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population and cultural property. These attacks were often justified by allegations of targeting the PKK.
During the reporting period, Turkish Armed Forces carried out large scale air and artillery operations using fighter jets, drones and artillery. The cumulative impact caused extensive damage to civilian property and rendered large areas uninhabitable. Reports that strikes hit areas known to be populated or previously inhabited raise serious concerns of indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks under IHL. Even where military objectives may have been present, a failure to take all feasible precautions to verify targets, minimize civilian harm and avoid damage to civilian objects would breach IHL.
Attacks on Villages
Evidence indicates deliberate targeting of civilian property by Turkish Armed Forces in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq during the period. Reports include the bombing of a residential home. Authorities claimed the area was used as a logistical or supply point for PKK fighters, yet no evidence was presented that the house itself served a military purpose. In the absence of verified proof that the homes targeted were military objectives, such strikes breach the IHL principle of distinction.
Attacks on Displacement Camps
Reports indicate that refugee and IDP camps were struck by Turkish drones in 2024 and 2025. Türkiye justified these operations by alleging the presence of PKK operatives or training sites inside the camps. A camp sheltering large numbers of Yazidi civilians was also struck. No public evidence has been provided to show that the camps or targeted locations qualified as military objectives under IHL.
VIOLATIONS AGAINST PERSONS IN THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY
A range of protection concerns persist for those in the power of the various parties to armed conflict, including instances of murder, torture, inhumane or degrading treatment, collective punishments, sexual violence, unfair trials and arbitrary deprivation of liberty. Women, children and person with disabilities, while afforded special protection, faced heightened risks related to the armed conflicts. As mass graves continue to be discovered, seemingly in connection with previous armed conflicts and IHL violations, Iraqi authorities are obliged to investigate and prosecute conducts that may amount to war crimes.
Murder of Civilians
Unlawful killings persisted during the reporting period. Islamic State continued to murder civilians, albeit at a lower level than before. At the same time, Iraq imposed death sentences following flawed judicial procedures and potentially coerced confessions. These conducts are serious violations of international humanitarian law and may constitute war crimes.