Skip to content
Explore

Non-international armed conflicts in Colombia

© Ortigosa Isabel, 16 July 2018, Colombia, Rural area of Caquetá. This man and his wife have been looking for their daughter for 18 years.

Snapshot

This version was last updated on : 8 October 2026
Asset 941

At a Glance

The armed conflicts in Colombia originate from the 1960s, when Marxist guerrillas formed in response to unequal land distribution, later fuelled by the illicit drug economy and the emergence of right-wing paramilitaries. Despite the 2016 peace agreement with FARC-EP and the conclusion of temporary ceasefires with various armed groups under President Petro’s “Total Peace” policy, no long-term agreements have been concluded, and violence has intensified since mid-2024. A first group of armed conflicts (which satisfy the requirements for the application of Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions) involve the Colombian National Army and multiple non-state armed groups, including the ELN, EGC, EMC and CDF; a second group of armed conflicts oppose these and other armed groups over territorial control and drug trafficking routes. Fragmentation of armed actors has continued to multiply factions, and violence between these splinter groups persisted throughout 2025 and 2026. Internal displacement has remained at similarly high levels, with around 7.2 million people internally displaced by the end of 2025.

Asset 680

THE ARMED CONFLICT(S)

Classification(s) and Parties to the Conflict(s)

  • Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN)
  • Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC) (formerly Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia)
  • Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and Estado Mayor Central (EMC)
  • Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and Comandos de la Frontera (CDF)
  • Non-international armed conflict between ELN and EGC
  • Non-international armed conflict between ELN and Frente 33 of Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente (EMBF)
  • Non-international armed conflict between EMC and Frente 57 Yair Bermúdez
  • Non-international armed conflict between EMC and EGC
  • Non-international armed conflict between EMC and ELN
  • Non-international armed conflict between EMC and Segunda Marquetalia (SM)
  • Non-international armed conflict between EMC and the EMBF
Asset 718

CIVILIAN HARM

Civilians were repeatedly attacked during 2026, as armed groups relied increasingly on threats, extortion, confinement and displacement to control territory. Explosive violence intensified sharply, with devices repeatedly placed on routes carrying civilian traffic, and anti-personnel mines continued to harm civilians.children. The use of armed drones expanded sharply,delivering imprecise munitions that regularly harmed bystanders and in some areas directly struck homes.. Reports indicate continued recourse to human shields and confinement, preventing departures and access to basic necessities. Forced displacement remained the principal driver of humanitarian emergencies, while access restrictions left many civilians without assistance amid rising needs. Civilian infrastructure, particularly schools and hospitals, was frequently damaged and at times deliberately targeted, roads and bridges were repeatedly strucks, and attacks on electricity transmission  Killings of social leaders and human rights defenders continued, although at a lower rate, while massacres claimed many civilian lives. Indigenous and Afro-descendant communities remained disproportionately affected by displacement and enforced disappearances. Child recruitment continued, increasingly online. Sexual violence served as an instrument of territorial and social control, with near-total impunity. Hostage taking continued, and confinement increased, depriving communities of food, health care and education.

Classification

Historical Background

The armed conflicts in Colombia find their roots in the 1960s, when campesino and student Marxist guerrillas reacted to unequal land distribution and to ownership policies favouring large landowners, agribusiness and mining companies. Following a decade of political violence known as ‘La Violencia’ (1948-1958), the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP) and the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN) were formed. Subsequent landowner mobilization in the 1980s fostered right-wing paramilitaries, notably the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC). Guerrilla groups relied on violence, abduction and extortion, while the illicit drug economy became a central driver that enriched multiple armed actors and intensified territorial competition. In the early 2000s, President Uribe’s firm security policy reduced criminality and coincided with the AUC’s disarmament, amid allegations against the government of human rights violations and ties to paramilitary groups. Under President Santos, peace negotiations culminated in a 2016 ceasefire with the FARC-EP, leading to demobilization, guaranteed political participation, UN verification, and the establishment of a transitional justice system. Despite the agreement, dissident factions emerged, large-scale protests unfolded, and conflict-related violence continued, especially since 2021. President Petro’s ‘Paz Total’ (‘Total Peace’) policy renewed talks and temporary ceasefires with different armed groups, but substantive agreements remain absent, and violence has risen since mid-2024.

Key Developments (2025–2026)

The reporting period saw several major developments:

  1. Escalating tension in Catatumbo: ELN’s longstanding control in this coca-growing region was recently challenged by the Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente (EMBF)’s Frente 33, prompting in January 2025 a coordinated ELN offensive that caused significant civilian harm, widespread confinement and large-scale displacement. In response, Colombia and Venezuela announced a joint anti-narcotics military operation in the region.
  2. Operación Perseo: as part of the so-called ‘Misión Cauca’, the Colombian Army launched ‘Operación Perseo’ in October 2024 to retake El Plateado in southern Cauca, an Estado Mayor Central (EMC) stronghold in an area with a significant EMC and ELN presence, aiming to reassert state control and disrupt cocaine production and trafficking.
  3. Ceasefires and the total peace process: under the ‘Total Peace’ framework inaugurated by President Petro, temporary bilateral ceasefires with the ELN, EMC, EMBF (a splinter group of EMC), Autodefensas Conquistadoras de la Sierra Nevada (ACSN), Segunda Marquetalia (SM) and Comuneros del Sur (a splinter group of ELN) were negotiated, and, at various points, concluded, extended, suspended or expired. While these initiatives made progress with Comuneros del Sur and the Coordinadora Nacional Ejército Bolivariano (CNEB, a splinter group of SM), no substantive agreement has been concluded with other groups, and violence has intensified.
  4. Fragmentation of armed actors: splits within ELN, EMC and SM multiplied factions, while other major groups remained comparatively intact.
  5. Assassination attempt, series of bombing and State response: following an attempted assassination of a presidential candidate in Bogotá on 10 June 2025, EMC carried out coordinated attacks across Cauca and Valle del Cauca, including in the city of Cali, using explosives, firearms and drones against police targets, causing police and civilian casualties. In response, security forces launched several operations against the EMC in the region.
  6. Increased displacement: at the end of 2024, internal displacement rose sharply, with 7.3 million internally displaced people reported, driven by conflicts and drug related violence.

Non-International Armed Conflicts

Asset 680

Colombia vs the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN)

Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN)

Despite intermittent lulls, the situation continues to meet the threshold of an Additional Protocol II-type Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC). Recurrent armed engagements leading to multiple casualties and displacement indicate a sustained level of intensity, and the ELN’s decentralized yet complex hierarchical structure and war-front discipline system reflects a sufficient degree of organization and responsible command. Financed through the cross-border drug trade, the ELN deploys assault rifles, explosives, mortars and drones and employs tactics including mortaring, sabotage, ambushes, roadblocks and sniper attacks, demonstrating a capacity for sustained and concerted military operations. The group also exercises military and social control over parts of Catatumbo and Chocó that prevents the government from exercising its effective authority.

Asset 680

Colombia vs the Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC)

Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and the Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC) (formerly Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia (AGC))

The confrontation between the Colombian National Army and the EGC constitutes a pre-existing Additional Protocol II–type NIAC. Recurrent clashes and prolonged operations, including air and drone strikes and the use of assault rifles and explosive devices, together with resulting casualties and displacement indicate a sufficient level of intensity. The EGC comprises political, military and economic branches. Its armed wing operates through multilayered, decentralized cells, enforces discipline via internal rules and social controls, and trains members by former guerrilleros, demonstrating the requisite organization and responsible command. Through a system of unpaid informers and checkpoints, the group maintains and has expanded territorial control across multiple departments and urban centres tied to its illicit economy, enabling sustained and concerted military operations.

Asset 680

Colombia vs the Estado Mayor Central (EMC)

Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and the Estado Mayor Central (EMC)

A pre-existing Additional Protocol II–type NIAC between Colombia and the EMC has continued in 2026. Intensity is reflected in recurrent engagements, involving heavy artillery, air and drone strikes, explosives and remotely piloted devices, heightened aerial bombardments, and the use of human shields, alongside casualties and persistent displacement. The EMC – the largest FARC-EP dissident group, formed in 2017 and self-identifying as its successor – combines decentralized leadership across blocs and fronts with central coordination, internal disciplinary rules and social control, systematic training, alliances, financing from criminal economies, communication, and recruitment practices, thereby meeting the organization criterion. The group holds and has expanded control over strategic corridors and Amazonian areas, sometimes assuming traditionally governmental functions.

Asset 680

Colombia vs the Comandos de la Frontera (CDF)

Non-international armed conflict between Colombia and the Comandos de la Frontera (CDF)

An Additional Protocol II–type NIAC between the Colombian National Army and the CDF persists despite ongoing peace talks. Formed in 2017 from FARC-EP dissidents and rebranded in 2020, the CDF focuses on drug trafficking at the Colombia-Ecuador border and operates mainly in Putumayo. Evidence of intensity includes recurrent (though intermittent) armed engagements; continued government forces deployments; the CDF’s use of military-grade weapons, explosives and drones; casualties; and displacement dynamics. In organizational terms, the CDF maintains a hierarchical military structure with specialized units, training and disciplinary rules under a central command. The CDF allies with other actors, controls rural territory where it establishes bases, and finances operations through the drug trade.

Asset 680

The Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN) vs the Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC)

Non-international armed conflict between the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN) and the Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC) (formerly Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia (AGC))

The pre-existing NIAC between the EGC and the ELN continued throughout the reporting period. Originating in a 2016 territorial dispute in Bolívar after FARC-EP demobilization, and despite a 2019 non-aggression understanding, the conflict expanded to departments such as Chocó, Norte de Santander and Antioquia. Recurrent clashes over military and social control as well as illegal activities involved explosive devices, sniper fire and drone attacks, causing casualties and displacement and satisfying the required intensity threshold. In organizational terms, both groups maintain structured command and logistical capacity enabling planned and prolonged military operations and the exercise of territorial control. ELN actions sustained territorial control in Catatumbo, while the EGC expanded its presence across numerous municipalities.

Asset 680

The Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN) vs the Frente 33 of the Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente (EMBF)

Non-international armed conflict between the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN) and the Frente 33 of the Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente (EMBF)

Tensions between the ELN and the EMBF, which split from the EMC in April 2024, escalated in late 2024 over control of illicit economies in Catatumbo and adjoining areas. In mid-January 2025, hostilities led to severe civilian harm, mass displacement and confinement, and further escalated throughout January 2026. The EMBF exhibits articulated leadership, identifiable commanders for its armed wing, majority-vote decision making, trained fighters, disciplinary capacity, financing through criminal enterprises including coca, a unified public voice, and territorial control in Catatumbo and parts of Antioquia and southern Bolívar. Since mid-January 2025, intensity of the violence and the parties’ organization have met the threshold of a NIAC between the EMBF and the ELN.

Asset 680

The Estado Mayor Central (EMC) vs the Frente 57 Yair Bermúdez

Non-international armed conflict between the Estado Mayor Central (EMC) and the Frente 57 Yair Bermúdez

The pre-existing NIAC between the EMC and Frente 57 has persisted, driven by contests over strategic drug-trafficking corridors, while the EMC maintained territorial footholds in Colombia and Venezuela. Following FARC-EP demobilisation, the EMC formed in 2017 as an umbrella of ex-FARC-EP fighters, and later splintering resulted in the creation of Frente 57 in November 2023. Despite the further split of EMBF from EMC in April 2024, hostilities between EMC and Frente 57 were recurrent and geographically dispersed from May 2024 through September 2025, with drone-enabled bombardments, vehicle burnings, multi-day engagements, power outages and disruption to infrastructure, as both sides employed heavy weaponry including bomb-armed drones, satisfying the requisite level of intensity. Although no further specific armed clashes were reported after September 2025, the conflict did not end, given the prevailing risk of resumption, as confirmed by an April 2026 report noting the continued presence of EMC-aligned groups and Frente 57 in the disputed areas of Cauca and Valle del Cauca. Both groups display the required degree of organization. Despite its limited numbers, Frente 57 combines a leadership structure — evidenced by its capacity to absorb repeated, targeted captures of senior and mid-level commanders between mid-2025 and May 2026 while maintaining continuity of command through immediate replacements — with control of key corridors to the Pacific and municipalities in northern Cauca and Valle del Cauca, issues centralised communications via its website and social media, and imposes recommendations on the civilian population, evidencing sufficient organization.

Asset 680

The Estado Mayor Central (EMC) vs the Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC)

Non-international armed conflict between the Estado Mayor Central (EMC) and the Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC) (formerly Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia (AGC))

Fuelled by territorial competition for cocaine production and trafficking, the pre-existing NIAC between the EMC and the EGC continued throughout 2025 and 2026. Although intensity had peaked in 2024, fighting remained recurrent and geographically dispersed, with clashes reported across departments including Chocó, Antioquia, Cauca, Valle del Cauca, Nariño, Putumayo, Caquetá and Arauca, alongside continued heightened civilian displacement. Hostilities included a five-day territorial confrontation in Antioquia department between 18 and 22 November 2025, and a drone-enabled clash lasting over twenty-four hours in Remedios, Antioquia, between 28 and 29 November 2025, in which explosives-laden drones were deployed. Hostilities more broadly featured explosive devices, long-range firearms, hand grenades, mines and drone-enabled airstrikes and aerial bombardment. Alliances remained fluid, with temporary alignments against a common rival, and simultaneous confrontations among the EMC, EGC and ELN continued to drive civilian displacement. The EGC retained its territorial stronghold in the Gulf of Urabá, spanning Antioquia, Chocó and Córdoba, where displacement figures remained high through the end of 2025. Both parties are sufficiently organized under IHL.

Asset 680

The Estado Mayor Central (EMC) vs the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN)

Non-international armed conflict between the Estado Mayor Central (EMC) and the Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN)

Originating from the post-2016 power vacuum left by the FARC-EP and first concentrated over coca-rich northeastern Catatumbo, the NIAC between the EMC and the ELN has continued throughout 2025 and 2026 across coca-rich territory and key trafficking routes in Arauca, Antioquia, Catatumbo and Chocó, with occasional joint fighting in Bolívar against the EGC. Fighting peaked in January and March 2025, with the March clashes reaching the highest intensity recorded since 2022, before growing more sporadic through the rest of 2025 and into 2026, though a high risk of resumption persists. Although both armed groups have witnessed fragmentation, a faction within each has continued to fight. In April 2024 the EMC split, with the Mordisco-led faction continuing hostilities against the ELN while the splintering EMBF engaged in talks with the government, and the ELN fractured in May 2024, with the Comuneros del Sur pursuing a separate peace process with the authorities. Despite these changes, both the EMC and the ELN continue to present a sufficient degree of organization.

Asset 680

The Estado Mayor Central (EMC) vs the Segunda Marquetalia (SM)

Non-international armed conflict between the Estado Mayor Central (EMC) and the Segunda Marquetalia (SM)

The pre-existing NIAC between the EMC and SM continued during 2025 and 2026. Both groups are post-2016 FARC-EP dissidents. SM formed in 2019 and splintered in November 2024, with the Pacific Guerrilleros and Border Commands reconstituted as the CNEB, while the initial SM remains active. Hostilities have met intensity criteria and centred on control of coca areas and trafficking corridors, with recurrent clashes from southwest Colombia to the Caquetá–Putumayo border and the Pacific coast of Nariño, and, in March 2026, an official warning of potential three-way confrontation between SM, the EMC and the EMBF in Huila department. The EMC employs armed drones alongside small arms, grenades and mines, and maintains territorial footholds in Colombia and Venezuela. SM uses small arms, machine guns, improvised explosive devices and anti-personnel mines. Reporting on discrete engagements during 2025 and 2026 has been limited, and the impact of the 2024 split within SM on overall violence remains unclear. Leadership, command structures and cross-border logistics on both sides fulfil the organization threshold, with SM displaying a stable and experienced leadership and command structure, composed of regional factions with defined geographic areas of operations, although the impact of the November 2024 split on SM’s internal organizational structure remains uncertain. The alliance between the SM and the ELN presumably ended after the ELN assassinated an SM leader in August 2025.

Asset 680

The Estado Mayor Central (EMC) and the Frente 33 of the Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente EMBF

Non-international armed conflict between the Estado Mayor Central (EMC) and the Frente 33 of the Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente (EMBF) New

After the EMBF split from the EMC in April 2024, hostilities between these FARC-EP dissident structures escalated. January 2025 clashes in Calamar (Guaviare) caused dozens of casualties, child recruitment and displacement, yet did not, at that stage, satisfy the intensity threshold. From May 2025, the EMC 44th Front (Amazonas Bloc) imposed an armed blockade in Guaviare, and fighting resumed in early June amid ongoing contests for territorial control, with reports of large-scale civilian confinement. Engagements continued to intensify into 2026. The violence is driven by disputes over coca cultivation and trafficking routes, alongside extortion and other illicit economies. Both groups are sufficiently organized under IHL, and the violence now amounts to protracted armed violence, establishing a NIAC between them.

Key Parties to the Conflict

State Parties

  • Colombia

Non-State Parties

  • Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN)
  • Ejército Gaitanista de Colombia (EGC) (formerly Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia (AGC))
  • Estado Mayor de los Bloques y el Frente (EMBF)
  • Comandos de la Frontera (CDF)
  • Estado Mayor Central (EMC)
  • Segunda Marquetalia (SM)
  • Frente 57 Yair Bermúdez (Frente 57)

Other Main Actors

Non-State Actors

  • Comuneros del Sur
  • Coordinadora Nacional Ejército Bolivariano (CNEB)

Civilian Harm

ATTACKS ON CIVILIANS

Civilians were killed and injured throughout the reporting period by explosive devices, including anti-personnel mines, by armed drones and in targeted killings, but armed groups also used threats, extortion, confinement, and displacement with a view to controlling territory. Imprecise drone strikes hit homes and bystanders, and mines were emplaced near schools, homes, and roads. Armed groups continued to use civilians as human shields. Forced displacement remained a principal driver of humanitarian emergencies, while access restrictions deprived many civilians of assistance amid rising needs.

Use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs)

Explosive violence intensified sharply during the reporting period, with the ELN held responsible for most attacks. Command-detonated devices were repeatedly placed along the Panamericana corridor in Cauca, a route carrying scheduled civilian passenger traffic. The deadliest incident, attributed to EMC factions – Estado Mayor Central is the largest FARC dissident group – killed numerous civilians after the road was blocked immediately before detonation. Civilian vehicles were also directly struck, and vehicle-borne devices used against police installations inside towns injured civilians and damaged homes. Such conduct raises serious concern under the principles of distinction and proportionality in attack.

Use of anti-personnel mines

Colombia remains among the countries most severely affected by anti-personnel mines. The victims were almost exclusively civilians engaged in routine activity, notably farmers, children, and workers maintaining the electrical network, with Catatumbo most affected. Devices were emplaced near schools, homes, and roads linking rural communities, making it difficult to characterize the resulting civilian risk as incidental. Contamination also extended into areas previously considered clear.

Use of armed drones

Use of armed drones expanded sharply, with EMC factions responsible for most attacks. Commercially available drones often deliver munitions in an imprecise manner, making indiscriminate attacks likely. In Cauca and Valle del Cauca, repeated strikes against police and military positions regularly harmed civilians, including children, and the first drone swarm was reported.

ATTACKS ON CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE

Civilian objects were affected in three patterns during the reporting period. Attacks against military or police targets in populated areas damaged civilian objects, while electricity transmission networks were deliberately attacked. Medical and educational facilities were impacted with a frequency suggesting not only indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks but also deliberate targeting. Roads and bridges on which rural communities depend were also repeatedly struck. Cauca, Chocó and Norte de Santander were the most affected departments.

Interference with education was frequent and widespread across several departments, affecting large numbers of children, teachers, and other staff, with Cauca, Norte de Santander and Valle del Cauca most affected. Most attacks occurred in classrooms or on school grounds, while many others took place on the routes children use to reach school. Schools were also struck by drone-dropped explosives during clashes between armed groups, causing significant structural damage.

VIOLATIONS AGAINST PERSONS IN THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY

Persons in the power of armed groups, including civilians under their control, detainees and demobilized fighters, suffered serious IHL violations throughout the reporting period. Killings of social leaders and human rights defenders continued, although at a lower rate, while massacres claimed many civilian lives. Enforced disappearances persisted, disproportionately affecting Indigenous and Afro-descendant communities. Child recruitment continued, occurring increasingly online. Sexual violence served as an instrument of territorial and social control, with near-total impunity. Hostage-taking continued, and confinement increased, depriving communities of food, healthcare, and education.

Killings of social leaders and human rights defenders continued, though at a lower rate than in 2025, while massacres killed a large number of civilians. Killings were concentrated where territorial contestation was most intense, notably in Cauca, Antioquia, and Arauca, affecting especially community and Indigenous leaders. Where parties contest the same territory, suspected collaboration becomes a basis for victimization, exposing civilians from multiple parties. Former fighters demobilized under the 2016 accord, who are civilians under IHL, were also killed by the EGC, the ELN, and fronts of the EMC and EMBF.